Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The publication accepts articles using a variety of research methods and theoretical approaches. The journal covers a wide range of topics related to public administration, including but not limited to:

Public Administration
Public Policy
Bureaucracy
Public Service
Political Science
Government Science
Decentralization
Administrative Reform
Organizational Development
Human Resource Development
Leadership
Performance Management
Other Social Sciences

Section Policies

Artikel

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Confidentiality: Information regarding manuscripts submitted by authors should be kept confidential and be treated as privileged information. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers must ensure that authors have acknowledged all sources of data used in the research. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. The reviewers should notify the journal immediately if they come across any irregularities, have concerns about ethical aspects of the work, are aware of substantial similarity between the manuscript and a concurrent submission to another journal or a published article, or suspect that misconduct may have occurred during either the research or the writing and submission of the manuscript; reviewers should, however, keep their concerns confidential and not personally investigate further unless the journal asks for further information or advice. Standards of Objectivity: Review of submitted manuscripts must be done objectively and the reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. The reviewers should follow journals’ instructions on the specific feedback that is required of them and, unless there are good reasons not to. The reviewers should be constructive in their reviews and provide feedback that will help the authors to improve their manuscript. The reviewer should make clear which suggested additional investigations are essential to support claims made in the manuscript under consideration and which will just strengthen or extend the work. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. In the case of double-blind review, if they suspect the identity of the author(s), they should notify the journal if this knowledge raises any potential conflict of interest. Promptness: The reviewers should respond in a reasonable time-frame. The reviewers only agree to review a manuscript if they are fairly confident they can return a review within the proposed or mutually agreed time-frame, informing the journal promptly if they require an extension. In the event that a reviewer feels it is not possible for him/her to complete review of a manuscript within the stipulated time, then this information must be communicated to the editor, so that the manuscript could be sent to another reviewer.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions:
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Confidentiality:
Information regarding manuscripts submitted by authors should be kept confidential and be treated as privileged information. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Acknowledgement of Sources:
Reviewers must ensure that authors have acknowledged all sources of data used in the research. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. The reviewers should notify the journal immediately if they come across any irregularities, have concerns about ethical aspects of the work, are aware of substantial similarity between the manuscript and a concurrent submission to another journal or a published article, or suspect that misconduct may have occurred during either the research or the writing and submission of the manuscript; reviewers should, however, keep their concerns confidential and not personally investigate further unless the journal asks for further information or advice.

Standards of Objectivity:
Review of submitted manuscripts must be done objectively and the reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. The reviewers should follow journals’ instructions on the specific feedback that is required of them and, unless there are good reasons not to. The reviewers should be constructive in their reviews and provide feedback that will help the authors to improve their manuscript. The reviewer should make clear which suggested additional investigations are essential to support claims made in the manuscript under consideration and which will just strengthen or extend the work.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest:
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. In the case of double-blind review, if they suspect the identity of the author(s), they should notify the journal if this knowledge raises any potential conflict of interest.

Promptness:
The reviewers should respond in a reasonable time-frame. The reviewers only agree to review a manuscript if they are fairly confident they can return a review within the proposed or mutually agreed time-frame, informing the journal promptly if they require an extension. In the event that a reviewer feels it is not possible for him/her to complete review of a manuscript within the stipulated time, then this information must be communicated to the editor, so that the manuscript could be sent to another reviewer.

Publication Frequency

Publication Schedule
Jurnal Administrasi dan Sosial Sains is an open-access, peer-reviewed scientific journal written in Indonesian. It is published twice a year (March and September) by the Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Jabal Ghafur University – Sigli, Aceh. The publication encourages academics, researchers, professionals, and practitioners to share ideas and research findings. The journal aims to offer valuable and applicable solutions to public administration challenges at the national and international levels.

Publication Schedule

Jurnal Administrasi dan Sosial Sains is an open-access, peer-reviewed scientific journal written in Indonesian. It is published twice a year (March and September) by the Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Jabal Ghafur University – Sigli, Aceh.
The publication encourages academics, researchers, professionals, and practitioners to share ideas and research findings. The journal aims to offer valuable and applicable solutions to public administration challenges at the national and international levels.

Author Fees
Type of Fee	Amount
Article Publication Fee	100,000.00 (IDR)
If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay the Article Publication Fee. Authors from low-income countries facing financial constraints may contact the editorial office for possible waivers or discounts.

Author Fees

Type of Fee

Amount

Article Publication Fee

100,000.00 (IDR)

If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay the Article Publication Fee.

Authors from low-income countries facing financial constraints may contact the editorial office for possible waivers or discounts.

Open Access Policy

Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options.

Username
Password
Remember me